印尼酒店 · 全员服务费薪酬架构(总纲)

Indonesia Hotel · All-Staff Service-Fee Compensation Architecture (General Framework)
施行 / Effective:2026-07 · 单位 / Unit:百万印尼盾 m = juta Rp · 适用 / Scope:CP / BSD / Airport 三店
前言
改革背景与缘由Background & Rationale

表1 改革时间线 / Table 1 · Reform timeline

阶段 Phase服务费机制 Service-fee mechanism基本工资 Basic结果与问题 Outcomes & issues
2025-12 前不收取 None高于 UMK无服务费收入,薪酬无竞争力 / no SC income, uncompetitive
2025-12收取,95% 当月全额分配下调至 UMK员工实发大增;GOP 上升(服务费过手账 + 基本工资降);产出与分配不匹配(用工少却分完全池)
2026-1 起UMK + KPI(废止全额分配)UMK服务质量不达标·公区卫生忽略·低效加班·店长倚重 OTA;一线员工激励不对称(淡季负相关强、旺季正相关弱)
2026-H2本次修订(见表2)UMK + 单独约定聚焦服务质量与健康可持续 / focus on quality & sustainability

表2 2026 年下半年修订方向 / Table 2 · H2 2026 revision directions

#措施 Measure对应 Sec.
1增设 W1 基础服务质量服务费(定额 + 刚性),回归服务费本义§4 / §5
2发放池绑定渠道佣金成本 = (营收 − 渠道成本) × 9.5%§2
3明确正式岗位定义;DW / Trainee 管理下放店总(高峰/淡季/应急增缩编),优秀 DW 可转正§4
4总池结余 → 1号位年度/半年度激励,引导健康客源结构(会员)§7
58 维 KPI,1号位到全员分担,随月度发放池走——净营收越高 KPI 越值钱§3 / §6
6刚性服务质量标准,1号位到全员分担,只扣不减,严重触发警告信§5

以下第一章起为上述方向的具体规则。 / Sections 1 onward set out the detailed rules.

1
服务费工资池(法定总额)Service-Fee Wage Pool (Statutory Total)
服务费工资池 = 酒店总交易额 TTV ÷ 1.21 × 10% × 95% = 酒店营收 × 10% × 95% = 营收 × 9.5% Pool = Hotel TTV ÷ 1.21 × 10% × 95% = Hotel Revenue × 10% × 95% (= Revenue × 9.5%)

依印尼法律,服务费按 95% 员工工资 / 3% loss and breakage(损耗与破损)/ 2% welfare(员工福利)分配;其中 95% 员工工资份额须全额发放完毕,建议以自然年为单位结清。任何蓄水/结转须经 PKB/工会同意并透明公示,不构成对个人的固定承诺。

Under Indonesian law, the service charge is split 95% employee wages / 3% loss and breakage / 2% welfare; the 95% employee-wage share must be fully paid out, ideally closed within each natural year. Any reserve/carryover requires PKB/union agreement and transparent disclosure, and is not a fixed commitment to any individual.

§

法律依据(待本地法务核验 / subject to local legal review):

  • Surat Edaran Menteri Tenaga Kerja No. SE-07/MEN/1990 — 酒店/餐厅 service charge 分配:95% 员工工资 / 3% loss and breakage / 2% welfareHotel & restaurant service-charge distribution: 95% employee wages / 3% loss and breakage / 2% welfare
  • UU No. 13 Tahun 2003 (Ketenagakerjaan) — service charge 计入 upah(工资)构成Service charge forms part of wages (upah)
  • Permenaker No. 6 Tahun 2016 — THR(宗教节日津贴)按基本工资计发;服务费属浮动项,不计入 THRTHR is paid on basic salary only; service fees are floating and excluded from THR

THR 执行口径:THR 仅以基本工资为基数计发;基础服务质量服务费工资、KPI 服务费工资均为浮动项,不计入 THR

THR practice: THR is calculated on basic salary only; both the Base Service-Quality Service-Fee and the KPI Service-Fee are floating and excluded from THR.

2
每月服务费工资发放池(浮动池)Monthly Distributable Pool (Floating)
每月发放池 = (酒店营收 − 渠道成本) × 10% × 95% = (Revenue − Channel Cost) × 9.5% Monthly Distributable Pool = (Hotel Revenue − Channel Cost) × 10% × 95% = (Revenue − Channel Cost) × 9.5%

用于当月发放「基础服务质量服务费工资」+「KPI 服务费工资」的总池子,随渠道结构浮动。

浮动杠杆 / Incentive lever:高佣金率渠道(OTA 等)→ 渠道成本高 → 池子小;直销/低佣金渠道 → 渠道成本低 → 池子大。

High-commission channels raise channel cost and shrink the pool; direct/low-commission channels lower cost and grow the pool.

店总目标:降低高佣金渠道依赖、提升直销占比——既做大蛋糕,又做优质、良性、可持续的客源成分。

GM objective: reduce reliance on high-commission channels and raise the direct-sales share — growing the cake while improving the quality and sustainability of guest sources.

口径说明(重要):「减去渠道成本」指从营收基数中扣 OTA 后再 ×9.5%,而非从 9.5% 池子里扣。因 OTA 佣金占营收 16~24%,大于 9.5% 池子本身,后者会让每月池子变负。

"Subtracting channel cost" means deducting OTA from the revenue base before applying 9.5% — not subtracting OTA from the 9.5% pool. OTA commissions (16–24% of revenue) exceed the 9.5% pool, so the latter would turn the pool negative every month.

3
每月 KPI 总池Monthly KPI Pool
每月 KPI 池 = 每月发放池 − 全员基础服务质量服务费工资标准合计 Monthly KPI Pool = Monthly Distributable Pool − Total Base Service-Quality Service-Fee Salary Standard

高表现月份全员拿更多,低表现月份全员拿更少——酒店全员与酒店业绩结成利益共同体

In high-performance months everyone earns more, in low-performance months less — all staff share a community of interest with the hotel's performance.

4
工资结构总表(W0 + W1 + W2)Salary Structure (W0 Basic + W1 Base Service-Quality Fee + W2 KPI Fee)

工资三层:W0 基本工资(THR 以此计发)| W1 基础服务质量服务费(刚性·专门用来扣,达标拿满、每项 −5% 封顶 50%、重大违规清零,见§5)| W2 KPI 服务费(浮动池,见§3)。W1 月标准即 KPI 分配权重(同阶);1号位例外:W1 刚性基数 25,KPI 分配权重上浮至 30(反映 8 维 KPI 全责,补充其月度重分配下降)。单位 m = juta Rp。

W0 basic (THR basis) | W1 Base Service-Quality Fee (rigid, deductible, see §5) | W2 KPI fee (floating, see §3). W1 standard = KPI weight, except the GM: W1 rigid base 25, KPI weight raised to 30 (reflecting full 8-dim KPI responsibility). Unit: m = juta Rp.

表3 岗位工资结构 / Table 3 · Position salary structure

岗位 PositionW0 基本工资 BasicW1 月标准 (=KPI权重) mW2 KPI 服务费排班 Schedule
1号位 GMUMK 基准¹25池内分配·权重 25做6休1
2/3号位 副总/储备 Deputy/ReserveUMK 基准¹12.5池内·12.5做6休1
前厅领班 FO LeadUMK 基准5池内·5做6休1
维修领班 ENG LeadUMK 基准4池内·4做5休2
房务/餐饮领班 HK·Cook LeadUMK 基准4池内·4做6休1
前厅前台 FO StaffUMK 基准3池内·3做6休1
公区正式工 PA Staff(如有)UMK 基准3池内·3做6休1
工程员工 Engineering Staff(正式)UMK 基准0计件·多劳多得²做5休2
房务/餐饮员工 HK·F&B Staff(正式)UMK 基准0计件·多劳多得²做6休1
DW日薪0计件·多劳多得²
Intern00
月度 W1 合计(标准编制)/ Monthly W1 totalCP = 78m · BSD = 78m · Airport = 82m(CP、BSD 无 Cook Lead,早餐外包)
§

W1 适用范围 / W1 scope:仅 ① 前三号位 + 前厅领班及所有前厅人员;② 维修/房务/餐饮领班;③ 公区正式工(如有)。房务/工程/餐饮员工(正式或 DW)为「基本工资 + 计件 KPI」,无 W1

W1 applies only to: ① top-3 + FO Lead & all FO staff; ② ENG/HK/Cook Leads; ③ PA formal (if any). HK/Eng/F&B staff (formal or DW) are 'basic + piece-rate KPI', no W1.

注¹ W0 基本工资为按 UMK 校准的金额(非等同 UMK),按地区:CP 5.8 / Airport 5.4 / BSD 5.25;单独约定从其合同。 注² 计件属 KPI 范畴(见附件C);须先符合刚性标准,再按计件单价 × 完成量多劳多得,不达标从计件扣。

Notes: ¹ W0 is UMK-calibrated (not exactly UMK), by region (CP 5.8 / Airport 5.4 / BSD 5.25); individual contracts prevail. ² Piece-rate is a KPI item (Annex C); meet rigid standards first, then earn by piece-rate.

表4 特殊约定人员(固定·不随 KPI 浮动,共3人)/ Table 4 · Individually-contracted (fixed, 3 people)

人员 Person岗位 Role固定内容 Fixed terms
Head of RevenueCP 1+2号位基本 10m (8+2) + W1 固定 25m(前3月 20m)+ KPI 上限 5m(前3月 10m);不进 W2 池
MarvinAirport 1号位(中)年包 25 万 RMB ÷ 12 折算 − 基本 5.8m,余额固定服务费;不进 W2 池
Stan WeiCP 3号位(中)月 17,600 RMB 折算 − 基本 5.8m,余额固定服务费;不进 W2 池

Contracted roles' W1 + KPI are priority draws deducted from the distributable pool first; they do not participate in the W2 pool-share (see Annex C).

模型之外 / Outside the standard model:上述 3 人按既有合同固定发放,不参与 W1/W2 池内分配,其固定服务费作为「优先扣项」先从发放池扣除,剩余才是标准编制员工「实际可分」的 W2 池。此安排可接受——体系已设「优秀 DW 可转正」通道,特殊约定人员即此通道的既成案例,并非制度缺口。

These three are paid per existing contracts and sit outside the standard W1/W2 pool-share; their fixed fees are priority draws, and the residual is the actually-distributable W2 pool for standard staff. Acceptable — the framework already allows outstanding DW to convert to formal staff, and these contracted terms are existing cases of that pathway, not a gap.

测算结论:对照附件 A 真实数据,15 个店月 KPI 池全部为正,上述标准每月均能覆盖,不算偏高,可予采用

Per Annex A, all 15 store-month KPI pools positive; standards covered every month — not too high, can be adopted.

5
刚性底线(扣 W1 · 只扣不减 · −5%/项 · 封顶50%)Rigid Baseline (deducted from W1; deduction only; −5%/item; cap 50%)

原则:只扣不减——刚性标准未达标即按比例扣减当月 W1 基础服务质量服务费,达标不额外奖励;从1号位到全员分别承担全部或相关部分。

Deduction only, never reduction: missing a rigid standard deducts from that month's W1 proportionally; meeting it earns no extra. Borne wholly or partly by everyone from the GM down.

四大安全 APP 下载率 ≥99.6% 差评 24h 回复率 100% 神灯响应 ≤10min 审计合规评估 运营规范执行

重大情形:四大安全/合规的重大情形 → 基础服务质量服务费清零触发警告信 + 提报升级处理(解除/降星/扣季度绩效),依 PP/PKB 正当程序。触及 50% 封顶通常意味着应更换该岗位负责人。

In major safety/compliance cases the Base Service-Quality Service-Fee is fully forfeited and the matter is escalated for disciplinary action (dismissal/downgrade/quarterly-performance deduction) per PP/PKB due process. Reaching the 50% cap usually indicates the position holder should be replaced.

6
1号位 KPI · 8维度 · 100分GM KPI · 8 Dimensions · 100 Points
维度 Dimension分值 Pts目标 / 口径 Target / Definition
月百房售卡达标率155 张/百房/日
月本人订住收佣 OCC 达标率15目标占比 55%
日 OCC 落位率1592–98%(近95%)
月神灯 AI 活跃率15目标 50%
月 RevPAR 完成率10对目标/预算完成率
月企业卡激活达标率10目标 = 房量 ÷ 3(每卡会员 ≥10)
平台点评分达标率10六平台均分 ≥4.7
神灯 AI 运营人才培养10由运营总监根据培训与认证开展情况主观评分
合计 Total100

KPI 维度选取规则:2/3号位、领班、员工的 KPI 不另设框架,从上述1号位8维度中挑选与本人岗位相关的部分,权重由店总按月团队管理重点灵活设定,合计100。

Deputy/Reserve, Leads, Staff do not use a separate framework — they select a relevant subset of the GM's 8 dimensions; weights set by GM monthly, summing to 100.

示例:前台系挑「售卡·收佣OCC·企业卡·平台点评分·神灯AI」;房务/工程主要挑「平台点评分 + 刚性底线」;餐饮挑「平台点评分(食评) + 刚性底线」。DW 走计件,不适用此8维度。

E.g. FO: card sales / commission OCC / corporate card / rating / AI; HK & Eng: rating + rigid baseline; F&B: rating (food) + rigid baseline. DW use piece-rate.

7
1号位额外:年度/半年度 GOP 激励GM Extra: Annual/Semi-Annual GOP Incentive

直营店 / Direct-operated

年度或半年度 GOP 激励规则由直营管理部设计,从当年剩余服务费总池分配。

Annual/semi-annual rules by the Direct-Operations Management Dept; from the year's remaining pool.

管理店 / Managed

同样从服务费总池分配;若超出服务费池,业主可额外奖励团队(类似「奖励管理费」,但奖励对象是团队而非管理公司)。

Also from the pool; where it exceeds, the owner may reward the team.

导向:以结余激励引导1号位减少为短期业绩牺牲服务质量的行为,做更健康的客源结构(会员)。

Intent: steer the GM away from short-termism that sacrifices quality, toward a healthier member-based guest mix.

GM 年度口径(重要):月度测算中 GM 的 W1+W2 因重分配而较旧制 GOP 制下降,但这并非 GM 的全年损失——超封顶结余(附件B cap 以上部分)按§7 作 GM 年度/半年度激励发放,月度少拿的部分年底补回甚至超出。

Annual view: the GM's monthly W1+W2 may dip versus the old GOP-based pay, but the above-cap surplus (Annex B) is paid out as the GM's annual/semi-annual incentive (§7) — the monthly shortfall is recovered or exceeded at year-end.

1–5月实测(理论口径):CP 净结余 33.8m ≈ GM 月度损失 32.4m(Desly 年度基本补平);BSD 净结余 24.2m > GM 损失 12.4m(Junius 年度净 +11.8m);Airport 净结余 14.5m(无标准 GM,作全员年终 KPI 奖)。1–5月均未触发 below-floor。

Jan–May (theoretical): CP net surplus 33.8m ≈ GM monthly loss 32.4m (Desly roughly whole); BSD 24.2m > 12.4m (Junius net +11.8m); Airport 14.5m (no standard GM → staff year-end bonus).

8
2/3号位 KPI 权重(留空·店总按月灵活设定)Deputy / Reserve GM KPI Weights (left blank — set by GM per month)
维度 Dimension2号位 副总 Deputy3号位 储备/店助 Reserve
月百房售卡达标率
月本人订住收佣 OCC 达标率
日 OCC 落位率
月神灯 AI 活跃率
月 RevPAR 完成率
月企业卡激活达标率
平台点评分达标率
神灯 AI 运营人才培养
合计 Total100100

说明:2/3号位各维度权重不固定,由店总根据当月团队管理重点灵活设定,各项合计 100。越往下越偏触点执行(售卡/收佣/激活/人才),越少战略获客(OCC落位/企业卡)。

Note: weights are not fixed — the GM sets them each month based on team-management priorities, summing to 100. Lower tiers lean toward front-line execution; less on strategic acquisition.

9
重大事项升级Escalation

重大事项提报 DGI 管理委员会

Major matters are escalated to the DGI Management Committee.

A
附件 A:逐月测算(2026年1–5月实测)Annex A: Monthly Calculation (Jan–May 2026 actuals)

单位 m = 百万印尼盾。发放池 = (营收 − OTA成本) × 9.5%;KPI池 = 发放池 − 该店 W1 合计。数据为 2026 年 1–5 月(6 月未含)。Unit: million Rp. Pool = (Revenue − OTA Cost) × 9.5%; KPI Pool = Pool − W1 total. Data: Jan–May 2026 (Jun not included).

店 Store营收 RevenueOTA成本净营收 Net发放池 PoolW1合计 BaseKPI池
CP1月1,640.7264.11,376.6130.87852.8
CP2月1,348.7255.61,093.1103.87825.8
CP3月1,631.7379.51,252.2119.07841.0
CP4月2,004.5425.21,579.3150.07872.0
CP5月2,258.7365.81,892.9179.878101.8
BSD1月1,202.1235.0967.191.97813.9
BSD2月1,255.3275.5979.793.17815.1
BSD3月1,609.2391.91,217.4115.67837.6
BSD4月1,566.0383.01,183.0112.47834.4
BSD5月1,648.0382.71,265.3120.27842.2
Airport1月1,468.4301.21,167.2110.98228.9
Airport2月1,339.1340.0999.194.98212.9
Airport3月1,359.3305.71,053.6100.18218.1
Airport4月1,574.1343.01,231.2117.08235.0
Airport5月1,657.2335.71,321.6125.58243.5

KPI池配色:绿 ≥30 黄 15–30 红 <15(淡季偏薄)

① 15 个店月 KPI 池全部为正,W1 合计(CP·BSD 78m / Airport 82m)每月均能覆盖,标准不算偏高,可予采用。

All 15 store-month KPI pools are positive; W1 totals covered every month — not too high, can be adopted.

② CP 最宽裕(KPI池 26~102m,均值约 59m);BSD 旺季 34~42m、Airport 旺季 35~44m 健康;淡季(1~2月)BSD 13.9~15.1m、Airport 12.9m 偏薄——即「低表现月全员少拿」的浮动效果,非标准过高。

CP most comfortable (26–102m, avg ~59m); BSD and Airport healthy in peak (34–44m) but thin in low season (BSD 13.9–15.1m, Airport 12.9m) — the intended float, not over-pricing.

💡

③ 建议:Airport 淡季 KPI 池偏薄,可设小额蓄水缓冲(旺季结余回补淡季),与「自然年发放完毕」原则吻合。

Recommendation: set a small reserve buffer for Airport low-season KPI pools, consistent with the natural-year full-distribution principle.

B
附件 B:淡旺季蓄水缓冲方案(建议稿)Annex B: Peak/Low-Season Reserve Buffer Scheme (draft)

原则:既做淡季保底,也做旺季封顶——以蓄水池为媒介,把旺季超封顶部分回补给淡季低于保底的部分,平滑全员月度 KPI 收入,年度结清。

Both a low-season floor and a peak-season cap apply: a reserve mediates — surpluses above the cap refill shortfalls below the floor, smoothing monthly KPI income, with annual closure.

  • 每月 KPI 可发额 = clamp(当月 KPI 池, 保底 Floor, 封顶 Cap)Monthly distributable KPI = clamp(monthly KPI pool, Floor, Cap)
  • 当月 KPI 池 > Cap:超出部分注入蓄水池(当月只发 Cap)Above Cap: excess goes into the reserve; only Cap is distributed
  • 当月 KPI 池 < Floor:由蓄水池补足至 Floor;蓄水池不足时按余额等比例补足(Floor 不保证全额)Below Floor: reserve tops up to Floor; if insufficient, top up pro-rata (Floor not guaranteed in full)
  • 自然年末结清:蓄水池余额全部发放(年终 KPI 奖),不跨年累计Year-end closure: reserve balance fully distributed as year-end KPI bonus, no cross-year carryover
店 Store保底 Floor (m)封顶 Cap (m)参考依据 Reference
CP2570实测 24~102,淡季守下限、旺季留结余
BSD1030实测 12~42,淡季保底、旺季封顶回补
Airport1232实测 10~44,淡季保底、旺季封顶回补

可持续性约束:Floor/Cap 为建议起步值,可按每店年度预算与淡旺季节律调整;Cap 须高于 Floor,且单店全年「Cap 以上累计」应能覆盖「Floor 以下累计」缺口,否则保底不可持续。

Sustainability: Floor/Cap are starting values; Cap must exceed Floor, and annual above-Cap surplus must cover below-Floor shortfall.

治理:蓄水池由店总按月计提与释放,运营财务复核,季度向员工公示余额;重大调整须报直营管理部并经 PKB/工会确认。

Governance: reserve accrued/released monthly by GM, reconciled by finance, disclosed quarterly; material adjustments require Direct-Ops + PKB/union confirmation.

C
附件 C:W2 KPI 服务费分配规则Annex C: W2 KPI Service-Fee Distribution Rule
  1. W2 池定义(实际可分 / actually distributable):W2 = 每月发放池 − W1 合计(标准编制)− contracted 固定服务费(见表4,优先扣项)DW 计件实发(实际)。即把模型之外的固定支出先扣,剩余才在标准 W1 适用岗间按权重分配。W2 = distributable pool − standard W1 total − contracted fixed fees (Table 4, priority draws) − actual DW piece-rate. Fixed out-of-model items are deducted first; the residual is shared among standard W1-eligible roles by weight.
  2. 参与人:W1 适用岗中非 contracted 的 perm/contract——1号位、2/3号位、FO Lead、其他领班、FO Staff、PA。排除:产出岗(房务/工程/餐饮员工·正式或 DW,走计件)、Intern、contracted 岗(如 Head of Revenue)Non-contracted perm/contract among W1-eligible roles; excludes output roles, Intern, contracted
  3. 分配公式:Formula:
个人 KPI 服务费 = W2 池 × (个人职级权重 × 个人 KPI 得分%) ÷ Σ(各参与人 职级权重 × KPI 得分%) Individual KPI = W2 pool × (own tier weight × own score%) ÷ Σ(participants' tier weight × score%)
  • 职级权重(仅 W1 适用岗参与):1号位 30(W1 刚性基数仍 25,解耦)/ 2·3号位 12.5 / FO Lead 5 / 其他领班 4 / FO Staff·PA 3。产出岗(房务/工程/餐饮员工·正式或 DW)走计件,不参与 W2 池内分配Tier weights: GM 30 (W1 rigid base stays 25, decoupled) / Deputy·Reserve 12.5 / FO Lead 5 / other Leads 4 / FO Staff & PA 3; output roles use piece-rate, outside W2
  • 得分规则:0–120 分,100 达标、120 封顶;低于解锁线(建议 60)记 0,不发 KPI(其 W1 仍按刚性底线考核)。得分 = 1号位 8 维度(或其子集)加权得分0–120, 100 on-target, 120 cap; below 60 = 0; score = weighted GM-8-dim (or subset)
  • 与 W1:刚性底线扣 W1(每项 −5% 封顶 50%),不动 W2;重大违规 W1 清零 + W2 当月记 0 + 升级Rigid baseline hits W1 only; major violation zeroes both + escalation
  • 与 contracted:Head of Revenue 等 KPI 按合同上限,不参与 W2;其 W1+KPI 作优先扣项先从发放池扣除Contracted KPI per cap, outside W2; W1+KPI are priority draws
  • 与 DW:走计件(符合标准 + 多劳多得),不参与 W2DW piece-rate, outside W2
  • 蓄水池:W2 月度可发额受附件 B clamp(W2 池, Floor, Cap) 约束Monthly W2 constrained by Annex B clamp

算例(标准编制,全员 100 分;U = W2池 ÷ Σ KPI权重,Σ权重 = W1合计 78 + 1号位上浮 5 = 83;GM KPI = 30 × U,月入 = W1(25) + KPI):注:本算例用简化口径 W2 = 发放池 − W1合计(未扣 contracted 固定费与 DW 计件),仅示分配机制;按「实际可分」口径的逐人测算见附件 D。

店·月发放池W1合计W2池UGM KPIGM月入
CP 5月(旺季)179.8m78m101.8m1.22736.8m61.8m
CP 2月(淡季)103.8m78m25.8m0.3119.3m34.3m
BSD 5月(旺季)120.2m78m42.2m0.50815.3m40.3m
BSD 1月(淡季)91.9m78m13.9m0.1685.0m30.0m

旺季 U>1(KPI>基础),淡季 U<1(KPI<基础);contracted 岗及 DW 不在此表。1号位 KPI 权重 30 > W1 基数 25(解耦),故 GM 月入 = 25 + 30×U。

D
附件 D:新旧制度逐人对比(2026年1–6月实测)Annex D: Per-Person New vs Old Comparison (Jan–Jun 2026 actuals)

方法论:以每店当月实际发掉的服务费总额为池,减去不动部分(DW/实习生/产出岗计件 + 3 个 contracted 固定费),剩余在 W1 适用岗间按 W1 标准 × 入职比例 重分配(1号位 KPI 权重 30)。基础工资 W0 不变;假设全员 100 分(达标)。明细见 新旧对比测算.csv(492 行)。

Method: take each store's actual monthly service-fee spend, subtract unchanged items (DW/intern/output piece-rate + 3 contracted fixed fees), redistribute the residual among W1-eligible roles by W1 standard × hire-date proration (GM KPI weight 30). W0 basic unchanged; all staff assumed at 100 (on-target). Details in 新旧对比测算.csv (492 rows).

表D-1 每店每月重分配倍数 U(U = 实际可分 W2 池 ÷ W1 新标准合计)

店 Store1月2月3月4月5月6月
CP0.790.500.571.070.901.42
BSD0.520.230.730.610.150.73
Airport0.75−0.190.270.09−0.070.07

U>0:W1 标准之上还有 KPI 可发;U<0:当月实际池撑不住 W1 标准(淡季,由附件 B 蓄水缓冲)。6月三店均入旺季(CP 1.42 最强)。

表D-2 增益最大 Top5(6个月差额合计)

角色差额 m
Shelly YanuariAirport销售(2/3号位)+17.6
Ferry PratamaCP前厅领班+14.5
Daniel NicholasAirport前厅前台+13.9
Maman SurahmanCP维修领班+11.3
Aidah DianasariBSD前厅领班+7.7

表D-3 下降最大 Top5(6个月差额合计)

角色差额 m
Desly HalomoanCPGM−30.0
Shinta PutriAirport前厅前台−9.6
Fionitta PriscilliaBSD前厅前台−7.2
Dava PutriAirport前厅前台−7.2
Indah ZahraAirport前厅前台−7.0

GM 年度由 §7 补平:Desly 1–6月月度 −30.0m + CP §7 结余(1–5月理论 33.8m,6月旺季再增)→ 全年净正;Junius 1–6月月度 −4.4m + BSD §7 结余 24.2m → 全年净 +19.8m 以上。GM 月度重分配下降由 §7 年度/半年度激励补回甚至超出。

GMs made whole annually via §7: Desly Jan–Jun monthly −30.0m + CP §7 surplus (Jan–May theoretical 33.8m, plus June peak) → net positive; Junius −4.4m + BSD §7 24.2m → net +19.8m+. The monthly dip is recovered or exceeded at year-end.

结论:新制将旧制下偏高 GM 与高绩效前台的份额,重分给原本偏低的领班与 2/3 号位(纠偏);DW/产出岗/contracted 不动;GM 月度下降由 §7 年度补平。假设全员 100 分,实际分数会上下调节 W2。

Conclusion: the new system redistributes from over-paid GMs and high-achiever FO to under-paid leads and 2/3-tier roles (correction); DW/output/contracted unchanged; GM monthly dip recovered via §7 annual incentive. Assumes all at 100; actual scores modulate W2.

印尼酒店 · 全员服务费薪酬架构(总纲) | 自 2026 年 7 月起施行
Indonesia Hotel · All-Staff Service-Fee Compensation Architecture (General Framework) · Effective July 2026
法规引用待本地法务核验 · 6 月已按 1–5 月方案发放 · 1–6 月新旧对比见附件 D